It was a dark and stormy night. No really, it was! On
Friday, March 24th, actually 26 years ago, the rain came down in sheets,
and the thunder shook the little synagogue on Winter Street in Hyannis. The
room was full to overflowing, with the moveable walls opened up like the high
holidays, congregants cheek-to-jowl with friends and family from all over. And on
the bimah, trying not to tremble with every thunderclap, stood nearly thirteen
year-old me. With my birthday five days away, I led services and read Torah in
my new blue blazer and polo tie, my grandfather’s kippah on my head and my
great-uncle’s tallit on my shoulders. And after chanting from parashat tzav
(though not half as well as you will, Brooke) and reading the haftarah, I spoke
about responsibility—my responsibility as a person and a Jew, and our
responsibility as a member of the community. I talked about the sacrifices
listed at the beginning of Leviticus 6—the burnt offering, the meal offering—and
the specificity of each ritual, and how that demanded us in our day to pay
attention to the details of what we do and how we do it. At least as well as a
thirteen year old can speak on the subject.
You may be wondering why I led and read on a Friday. At the
Cape Cod Synagogue, as in many Reform congregations, Torah was read on Friday.
Saturday morning services were not a regular thing, but were an option for bar
and bat mitzvah, and it was offered to me as it was offered to my classmates. But
somehow that didn’t sit right with me. It felt wrong to have some kind of
special, private service. I remember at the time leading up to my bar mitzvah
that I asked to lead a ‘normal’ service, a regular service, a congregational
service. I didn’t want special treatment (very New England of me) but there was
something about the idea of leading what the congregation expected, of being a
part of that experience, that resonated with me. And I was proud for having led
a regular congregational service for my bar mitzvah. It was only as an adult
that I found out that Friday night had been used as a lesser-than experience
for women.
I bring this up at a time when the bar mitzvah is evolving,
at breakneck pace. Increasingly families are choosing to create bespoke
experiences, often outside the synagogue, sometimes for educational purposes,
and sometimes because they want what they want, and they can find a rabbi or a
cantor or a ‘spiritual leader’ who is happy to create the experience that child
and that family wants. At the same time, synagogues are looking at their bar
mitzvah programs and services and are asking the question—is this creating the
right experience, the right education, the right kind of Jewish person we want
to create? The Reform Movement a few years ago started what they call the Bar
Mitzvah Revolution as a way of encouraging congregations to re-imagine how they
do teen engagement. If that weren’t enough, the bar mitzvah is coming under
fire not just from without but within, as folks like Rabbi Patrick Aleph of
Atlanta wrote a couple of years ago that we should ban the bar mitzvah,
describing it as an impediment to educational and liturgical engagement and
merely a revenue stream for synagogues, an addiction that must be broken.
For a long time—even as a teen—I’ve felt we invest too much
capital into one experience, one day, in a Jewish adolescent’s life. I remember
giving advice as a high schooler classmates of my sister telling them that it
was just one day and not to get too worked up over it, and I hear the same
advice given by many well-meaning adults to kids today. Sometimes I chafe when
I hear my own teenage words used today but really, we do invest so much energy,
time, and emotional bandwidth into this one life cycle event. And suffice to
say there’s room for improvement in the whole experience, from educational
process to logistics to the day itself, no matter how wonderfully we as a congregation
may handle it. And if I may be so bold, I’d like to suggest my experience 26
years ago may give us a model for what it should be like.
First, there was the communal element. I wanted to lead a regular
service with the congregation present. No gimmicks. No themes. No bells or
whistles. Everyone invited to the oneg, everyone participating in their normal service.
Perhaps the idea of having a 13-year old on the bimah gives some of you pause,
but what does it say when we allow the bar mitzvah to be a private, family
event instead of welcoming the child into the minyan as a community? As I led
services—with my voice breaking and my kippah falling off my head at one point—I
still understood that this was the congregation’s service, and that I was
entrusted with leading it adequately. I think I did okay, but there’s
tremendous power in that, and in being welcomed into communal Jewish life that
way. You can’t have that experience in a ballroom somewhere.
The next was choice. I wasn’t given an option of whether to
do one, but how, and when. I chose what to talk about for my bar mitzvah. I
chose whether to have it on a Friday night. That level of choice required that I
be involved from the beginning—at a 13-year old’s level—in the liturgical
process. Not just learning the prayers but understanding the service structure
and making some decisions about my involvement. For people on the cusp of
adulthood, being given that choice is a powerful thing. What teen doesn’t want
choice, after all? Choice takes into consideration the individual and their needs.
Choice means trust. Choice is empowerment.
But with that choice comes responsibility. Of course, that’s
what I preached on that night, but there is a responsibility to standing on the
bimah. There are expectations and requirements to fulfill—not just my own or my
family’s but the congregation’s as well. I had an obligation that night, as the
rain came down, and really, every bar and bat mitzvah has that same
obligation---to be there for the rest of the community, in prayer, in study, in
support and in times of need. That is the point of it all.
I’ve carried that experience—that sense of what it means to
be part of a community, what it means to be entrusted by that community, and
what it means to be obligated to the community—for 26 years. It has defined my
Judaism in so many ways, and would have regardless of my calling. The thunder
didn’t hurt, either. And as we prepare for another child to celebrate bat
mitzvah for this portion, the day before I turn 39, I would ask you this: does
your Judaism have space for community? Does it have room for choices—for yourself
and others? Does your Judaism give you a sense of Obligation—to your community,
to your people, to God? Because it’s not just about one day—it’s about every
day. Every day we’re called to make choices. Every day we’re called to be part
of a community. Every day we are reminded of our obligations. May we fulfill
them meaningfully, to the betterment of all. Amen.
We share parsha Tzav as our Bar Mitzvah portion but my time to bimah is closer to twice 26 years. The Conservative congregations of the era were a little less distinguishable in their liturgy and process from Orthodox services than they are now. Friday night was social kabbalat Shabbat and Bat Mitzvah time, though not all parents sent their daughters to Hebrew School. The JCC of Spring Valley was more of a growing enterprise, processing through two boys a week for Bar Mitzvah through the school year. Choices were pretty limited. You attended trop class, had Bar Mitzvah lessons with the Cantor, did the haftarah and maftir as a requirement, then shacharit for those who mastered the requirement. Like yours, and very unlike Wilmington, the Bar Mitzvah never displaced the congregation. The Bar Mitzvah family could only have five of the aliyot, two were reserved for the congregation. When I proposed that to a ritual committee here at a time when Bnai Mitzvot were more plentiful than they are now, they responded in fear that it would jeopardize the Bar Mitzvah program and its revenues. Whether I would regard myself as really welcome in the broadband that Judaism has become, or whether Judaism has really become a series of mini-clubs where a few participants tell each other how wonderful they all are to the neglect of anyone else could be argued both ways. The promotion after Bar Mitzvah was USY, sometimes entry into the USY clique for some, but nobody would be turned away from a game of shirts-skins basketball.
ReplyDeleteFor Kol Nidre, my congregation has a supplemental handout that lists all the ongoing committees and activities. Next to the committee list there were some with an asterisk that could especially use people with specific talents. I wonder if any of the baalebatim or chairmen of those committees ever actually sought anyone out to enhance participation. There is a difference between broadcasting a general welcome and a personal invitation extended to you because somebody thought you might be able to enhance the activity. If you look at something really worthwhile like the JNF breakfast invitation that arrived, looking beyond the event, you will basically see a small committee of prosperous attorneys getting together on their own to design it. Didn’t see any doctors, teachers, clergy, retirees. Where were those invitations, where was the recognition that talent extends to people we don’t know yet? Or how much of the decline in participation in Jewish institutions starting at my Parsha Tzav and accelerating at your Parsha Tzav is really a form of leadership generated attrition? You cannot just have logos and branding that say Welcome. We each had our Bar Mitzvah as a part of our community, contributors to the service that would have otherwise proceeded without us. Unfortunately, as the Pew Report illustrates, a good fraction of our institutions seem quite content to move along without some of us.